GKRootWire
Cloud & Sysadmin Microsoft Confirms Preview Update Wipes Out Desktop SettingsAI Nvidia to Acquire Hugging Face for $12.9 BillionDev Tools A Deep Dive Into Intrusive Linked ListsGadgets DJI's Romo 2 Robovac Adds Local-Only Mode After Privacy ScareAI Nvidia Reportedly Moves to Acquire Hugging FaceAI Anthropic Launches Claude Tools for AI Shopping AgentsCloud & Sysadmin Microsoft Confirms Preview Update Wipes Out Desktop SettingsAI Nvidia to Acquire Hugging Face for $12.9 BillionDev Tools A Deep Dive Into Intrusive Linked ListsGadgets DJI's Romo 2 Robovac Adds Local-Only Mode After Privacy ScareAI Nvidia Reportedly Moves to Acquire Hugging FaceAI Anthropic Launches Claude Tools for AI Shopping Agents
AI

OpenAI's Next Model Ditches Step-by-Step Thinking, Worrying Safety Researchers

Astra's new 'recurrent depth' technique lets the model reason in loops rather than a visible chain of steps, making its thought process harder to audit.

OpenAI is reportedly building a new model, internally called Astra, that reasons differently from current systems like o1 or o3. Instead of working through a problem in a linear, step-by-step chain that can be read and checked afterward, Astra reportedly uses 'recurrent depth' — cycling its internal computation through loops before producing an answer.

This could make the model more efficient or capable at certain problems, since it isn't locked into producing a token-by-token trail of its reasoning. But that same trait is what's worrying some AI safety researchers: chain-of-thought outputs, however imperfect, have become one of the few tools available for spotting when a model is scheming, hallucinating, or reasoning toward a harmful conclusion. A model that thinks in opaque loops removes much of that visibility.

OpenAI hasn't detailed how it plans to monitor or interpret Astra's internal reasoning if the technique ships in a production model.

Why it matters: Chain-of-thought monitoring has quietly become a load-bearing safety mechanism across the industry, and abandoning it for performance gains sets a precedent other labs may follow. If interpretability tools can't keep pace with new reasoning architectures, oversight of frontier models could get harder just as they get more capable.

Sources: TechCrunch