GKRootWire
Gadgets HP's Convertible OmniBook X Flip Drops to $699 at Best BuyGadgets Xiaomi 17 Ultra's 'Moon Mode' Got Fooled by a Solar EclipseAI Cerebras Partners with OpenAI to Supercharge GPT-5.6 Inference SpeedAI Lumabri Lets You Run Mixture-of-Experts AI Models Across a P2P SwarmDev Tools ArcadeMaker Brings a Custom Scripting Language and IDE to C# Game DevelopmentDev Tools DeepSeek Launches 'Harness' Developer Preview for Agentic CodingGadgets HP's Convertible OmniBook X Flip Drops to $699 at Best BuyGadgets Xiaomi 17 Ultra's 'Moon Mode' Got Fooled by a Solar EclipseAI Cerebras Partners with OpenAI to Supercharge GPT-5.6 Inference SpeedAI Lumabri Lets You Run Mixture-of-Experts AI Models Across a P2P SwarmDev Tools ArcadeMaker Brings a Custom Scripting Language and IDE to C# Game DevelopmentDev Tools DeepSeek Launches 'Harness' Developer Preview for Agentic Coding
Security

Flock's New Guardrails Can't Fully Stop Cops From Abusing License Plate Cameras

Flock Safety is rolling out audit tools to catch officers who misuse its surveillance network for personal reasons, but experts say technical fixes can't solve a policy problem.

Flock Safety, the company behind a massive network of automated license plate readers used by thousands of police departments, is adding features meant to flag when officers search the system for non-work reasons—like tracking an ex-partner. The tools include audit trails and usage alerts designed to make misuse easier to detect after the fact.

But security and policy researchers argue this doesn't fix the underlying problem: individual police agencies control their own access rules, auditing practices, and disciplinary follow-through. Flock can generate logs, but it can't force a department to review them, punish an officer, or even tell the public when abuse happens. Several documented cases of officers using the cameras to stalk people occurred despite existing oversight mechanisms.

The episode highlights a familiar pattern in surveillance tech: vendors ship monitoring and audit features as a selling point, while the actual accountability depends entirely on customer institutions that often have little incentive to expose their own misconduct.

Why it matters: This is a case study in the limits of 'trust us, it's auditable' security design—logging capability means nothing without an external party willing to enforce consequences. Anyone evaluating surveillance or access-control products should ask who actually reviews the logs, not just whether logs exist.

Sources: Ars Technica